<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Polytechnic &#187; internet explorer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://polytechnic.co.uk/blog/tag/internet-explorer/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://polytechnic.co.uk</link>
	<description>The personal brain dump of Garrett Coakley</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 14:46:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft’s Interoperability Principles and IE8</title>
		<link>http://polytechnic.co.uk/blog/2008/03/microsofts-interoperability-principles-and-ie8</link>
		<comments>http://polytechnic.co.uk/blog/2008/03/microsofts-interoperability-principles-and-ie8#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 09:41:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>garrettc</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[css]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet explorer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[markup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[world wide web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="http://blogs.msdn.com/ie/archive/2008/03/03/microsoft-s-interoperability-principles-and-ie8.aspx">

We’ve decided that IE8 will, by default, interpret web content in the most standards compliant way it can. This decision is a change from what we’ve posted previously.

</blockquote>
<p>- Dean Hachamovitch on the <a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/ie/archive/2008/03/03/microsoft-s-interoperability-principles-and-ie8.aspx">IEBlog</a></p>

<p>This is great news, kudos to the Microsoft team for listening to the community and changing their approach.</p>

<p>(for more background see Jeremy Keith and Jeffery Zeldman's articles in <a href="http://alistapart.com/issues/253">issue 253 of A List Apart</a>)</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="http://blogs.msdn.com/ie/archive/2008/03/03/microsoft-s-interoperability-principles-and-ie8.aspx"><p>We’ve decided that IE8 will, by default, interpret web content in the most standards compliant way it can. This decision is a change from what we’ve posted previously.</p></blockquote>
<p>- Dean Hachamovitch on the <a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/ie/archive/2008/03/03/microsoft-s-interoperability-principles-and-ie8.aspx">IEBlog</a></p>
<p>This is great news, kudos to the Microsoft team for listening to the community and changing their approach.</p>
<p>(for more background see Jeremy Keith and Jeffery Zeldman’s articles in <a href="http://alistapart.com/issues/253">issue 253 of A List Apart</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://polytechnic.co.uk/blog/2008/03/microsofts-interoperability-principles-and-ie8/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>They Shoot Browsers, Don’t They?</title>
		<link>http://polytechnic.co.uk/blog/2008/02/they-shoot-browsers-dont-they</link>
		<comments>http://polytechnic.co.uk/blog/2008/02/they-shoot-browsers-dont-they#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 10:55:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>garrettc</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet explorer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[world wide web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="http://www.alistapart.com/articles/theyshootbrowsers">

The proposed default behavior for version targeting in Internet Explorer solves the problem of “breaking the web” in much the same way that decapitation solves the problem of headaches. In its current state, version targeting is a cure that will kill the patient. Version targeting could have been an opportunity for Microsoft to demonstrate innovation. Instead, the proposed default behavior demonstrates a fundamental misunderstanding of the World Wide Web, a place that according to its creator, Sir Tim Berners-Lee, will always be “a little bit broken.”

</blockquote>

<p>- <a href="http://www.alistapart.com/articles/theyshootbrowsers">Jeremy Keith</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="http://www.alistapart.com/articles/theyshootbrowsers"><p>The proposed default behavior for version targeting in Internet Explorer solves the problem of “breaking the web” in much the same way that decapitation solves the problem of headaches. In its current state, version targeting is a cure that will kill the patient. Version targeting could have been an opportunity for Microsoft to demonstrate innovation. Instead, the proposed default behavior demonstrates a fundamental misunderstanding of the World Wide Web, a place that according to its creator, Sir Tim Berners-Lee, will always be “a little bit broken.”</p></blockquote>
<p>- <a href="http://www.alistapart.com/articles/theyshootbrowsers">Jeremy Keith</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://polytechnic.co.uk/blog/2008/02/they-shoot-browsers-dont-they/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Final CSS fixes for IE7 published</title>
		<link>http://polytechnic.co.uk/blog/2006/08/final-css-fixes-for-ie7-published</link>
		<comments>http://polytechnic.co.uk/blog/2006/08/final-css-fixes-for-ie7-published#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>garrettc</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[css]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet explorer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[upgrade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[world wide web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Markus Mielke has published the <a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/ie/archive/2006/08/22/712830.aspx">final list of <abbr title="Cascading Style Sheets">CSS</abbr> changes for IE7</a> now that they're in lockdown and getting ready for shipping.</p>

<blockquote cite="http://blogs.msdn.com/ie/archive/2006/08/22/712830.aspx">

In all, we made over 200 behavior changes (bug fixes or new features) under strict mode to improve CSS2.1 compliance.

</blockquote>

<p>Some of the fixes include the infamous <a href="http://www.positioniseverything.net/explorer/peekaboo.html">peekaboo bug</a>, <a href="http://www.positioniseverything.net/explorer/threepxtest.html">three pixel text jog</a>, and <a href="http://www.positioniseverything.net/explorer/doubled-margin.html">doubled float-margin bug</a>.</p>

<p>As well as the bug fixes there are other improvements including <code>:hover</code> on all elements not just &#60;a&#62;, <code>background-attachment: fixed</code> working on all elements, and support for min/max width/height (finally!!).</p>

<p>I'm disappointed that <code>display: table</code> still isn't in there but there is hope for the future</p>

<blockquote cite="http://blogs.msdn.com/ie/archive/2006/08/22/712830.aspx">

We are already planning for the next IE release and will continue down the road of improving our CSS support.

</blockquote>

<p>Praise where praise is due, I think the team over there has done a great job so far. Now I (and many others) want to see this kept up.</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Markus Mielke has published the <a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/ie/archive/2006/08/22/712830.aspx">final list of <abbr title="Cascading Style Sheets">CSS</abbr> changes for IE7</a> now that they’re in lockdown and getting ready for shipping.</p>
<blockquote cite="http://blogs.msdn.com/ie/archive/2006/08/22/712830.aspx">
<p>In all, we made over 200 behavior changes (bug fixes or new features) under strict mode to improve CSS2.1 compliance.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Some of the fixes include the infamous <a href="http://www.positioniseverything.net/explorer/peekaboo.html">peekaboo bug</a>, <a href="http://www.positioniseverything.net/explorer/threepxtest.html">three pixel text jog</a>, and <a href="http://www.positioniseverything.net/explorer/doubled-margin.html">doubled float-margin bug</a>.</p>
<p>As well as the bug fixes there are other improvements including <code>:hover</code> on all elements not just &lt;a&gt;, <code>background-attachment: fixed</code> working on all elements, and support for min/max width/height (finally!!).</p>
<p>I’m disappointed that <code>display: table</code> still isn’t in there but there is hope for the future</p>
<blockquote cite="http://blogs.msdn.com/ie/archive/2006/08/22/712830.aspx">
<p>We are already planning for the next IE release and will continue down the road of improving our CSS support.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Praise where praise is due, I think the team over there has done a great job so far. Now I (and many others) want to see this kept up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://polytechnic.co.uk/blog/2006/08/final-css-fixes-for-ie7-published/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IE7 to be distributed via Automatic Update</title>
		<link>http://polytechnic.co.uk/blog/2006/07/ie7-to-be-distributed-via-automatic-update</link>
		<comments>http://polytechnic.co.uk/blog/2006/07/ie7-to-be-distributed-via-automatic-update#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>garrettc</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[browsers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet explorer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[upgrade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[world wide web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>More news on the Internet Explorer front from the <a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/ie/archive/2006/07/26/678149.aspx">IE blog</a>:</p>

<blockquote cite="http://blogs.msdn.com/ie/archive/2006/07/26/678149.aspx">

As we get close to the final availability of Internet Explorer 7, I want to provide an update on our distribution plans. To help our customers become more secure and up-to-date, we will distribute IE7 as a high-priority update via Automatic Updates (AU) shortly after the final version is released for Windows XP, planned for the fourth quarter of this year.

</blockquote>

<p>There will be the option to roll back to IE6 at any point or ignore the update (up to a certain point I should imagine) for those corporate installations that need to take their time about these things.</p>

<p>I think pumping it out through Automatic Update is a good thing, and not just from the security point of view. As a web developer I'm all for a mechanism that gets a more standards compliant rendering engine out there onto as many computers as possible. The memories of the upgrade path from IE5 to IE6, and watching visitor statistics slowly change, is still indelibly etched on my mind.</p>

<p>I'm still confused about what they're playing at with the <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/travelinlibrarian/178434975/">user interface</a> though.</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More news on the Internet Explorer front from the <a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/ie/archive/2006/07/26/678149.aspx">IE blog</a>:</p>
<blockquote cite="http://blogs.msdn.com/ie/archive/2006/07/26/678149.aspx">
<p>As we get close to the final availability of Internet Explorer 7, I want to provide an update on our distribution plans. To help our customers become more secure and up-to-date, we will distribute IE7 as a high-priority update via Automatic Updates (AU) shortly after the final version is released for Windows XP, planned for the fourth quarter of this year.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>There will be the option to roll back to IE6 at any point or ignore the update (up to a certain point I should imagine) for those corporate installations that need to take their time about these things.</p>
<p>I think pumping it out through Automatic Update is a good thing, and not just from the security point of view. As a web developer I’m all for a mechanism that gets a more standards compliant rendering engine out there onto as many computers as possible. The memories of the upgrade path from IE5 to IE6, and watching visitor statistics slowly change, is still indelibly etched on my mind.</p>
<p>I’m still confused about what they’re playing at with the <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/travelinlibrarian/178434975/">user interface</a> though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://polytechnic.co.uk/blog/2006/07/ie7-to-be-distributed-via-automatic-update/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Internet Explorer 7: Beta 2 released</title>
		<link>http://polytechnic.co.uk/blog/2006/01/internet-explorer-7-beta-2-released</link>
		<comments>http://polytechnic.co.uk/blog/2006/01/internet-explorer-7-beta-2-released#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2006 18:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>garrettc</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[css]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[html]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet explorer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[world wide web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Here's the <a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/ie/archive/2006/01/31/520812.aspx">IEBlog entry</a> or just go straight to the <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/windows/ie/ie7/ie7betaredirect.mspx">download page</a>. Ho hum, there goes the next couple of weeks while we get some empirical testing done.</p>
<p>Details of the CSS parser fixes can be found on the IEBlog <a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/ie/archive/2005/07/29/445242.aspx">here</a> and <a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/ie/archive/2005/09/02/460115.aspx">here</a>.</p>

<p><strong>Update:</strong> a link to the <a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/ie/releasenotes/default.aspx">release notes</a> would probably help too.</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here’s the <a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/ie/archive/2006/01/31/520812.aspx">IEBlog entry</a> or just go straight to the <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/windows/ie/ie7/ie7betaredirect.mspx">download page</a>. Ho hum, there goes the next couple of weeks while we get some empirical testing done.</p>
<p>Details of the CSS parser fixes can be found on the IEBlog <a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/ie/archive/2005/07/29/445242.aspx">here</a> and <a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/ie/archive/2005/09/02/460115.aspx">here</a>.</p>
<p><strong>Update:</strong> a link to the <a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/ie/releasenotes/default.aspx">release notes</a> would probably help too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://polytechnic.co.uk/blog/2006/01/internet-explorer-7-beta-2-released/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Served from: polytechnic.co.uk @ 2012-05-21 19:36:53 by W3 Total Cache -->
